The aim of this scan is to objectify the strengths of young potential controllers. They will need different abilities for their future positions depending on the role, and once this power is in picture, we offer them a wonderful moment of reflection. How strong are they in administrative matters, accounting/reporting and F, P&A. Do they have profit value/value creation in them? And are they as digitally minded as one would expect in young talent. All these questions will indeed be answered, both in absolute terms and in comparison, with peers. How do brainpower and knowledge compare.

The aim of this scan is to measure a candidate’s subject-matter strengths in the administrative domain. To what extent can the candidate function professionally as an administrative assistant and to what extent is there potential to take on more financial control/analytical work? This scan is perfectly designed to objectively determine the strengths of beginners, lateral entrants, people re-entering the workforce or those whose abilities are not entirely clear.

The aim of this scan is to measure individual candidates or complete finance teams on subject-matter strength as Business Controller and CFO Potential. This version of the scan uses a selection of questions from our other widely used scans. These are used all over the world to evaluate a candidate’s knowledge/competence in finance areas. The power of the scan (besides the quality of the questions) also lies in the comparison with global participants of different caliber. From the details, we group the strengths into two main groups: traditional Financial Control and Business Partnering.

The aim of this scan is to show your strength and knowledge in the field of Business Intelligence and Data. A proliferation of functions, courses and technical developments have created tens of thousands of mostly self-appointed ‘experts’. Where do you stand in this field? We are not measuring your skill with any particular application, but really your strength in various subject matter areas that Data Scientists, Data Engineers and Data Analysts should have no trouble with. So where do you stand and what type are you? See this as a moment of reflection. In the context of growth and employability as well.

Het doel van deze scan is om kandidaten en/of teams door te meten op Digital Finance kracht. Deze versie kijkt breed naar verschillende aspecten. De kracht van de scan zit (naast de kwaliteit van de vragen) ook in de vergelijking met de deelnemers van verschillend kaliber. Vanuit de details groeperen we de krachten in twee hoofdgroepen: Data en Processen & Rapportage.

This scan aims to portray your awareness of Digital Finance. Are you more or less up to date with the many developments and do you understand when and where they apply? These topics are rather far removed for many professionals, others are right in there. We offer you a chance to see where you stand, compared to your peers. As a moment of reflection but also in the context of development and employability.

The aim of this scan is to measure the subject matter strength of candidates in the field of Financial Control. This version (plus) is the most complex version and compares candidates against a group of high-level peers, in particular experienced interim managers, CFOs, Finance Managers, Registered Accountants and Registered Controllers. We measure via several axes and group those top level in two dimensions: conceptual strength (accounting, analytical) and operational strength (hands-on, executive).

The aim of this scan is to measure the subject matter strength of candidates in the field of Financial Control. This version (plus) is the most complex version and compares candidates against a group of high-level peers, in particular experienced interim managers, CFOs, Finance Managers, Registered Accountants and Registered Controllers. We measure via several axes and group those top level in two dimensions: conceptual strength (accounting, analytical) and operational strength (hands-on, executive).

The aim of this scan is to measure the subject matter strength of candidates in the field of Financial Control. This version (standard) is the operational version and compares candidates against a group of peers who mostly have operational Financial Control jobs or in whom solid Financial Control knowledge and skills is expected. We measure via several axes and group the top level in two dimensions: conceptual strength (accounting, analytical) and operational strength (hands-on, executing).

The aim of this scan is to measure the subject matter strength of candidates in the field of Financial Control. This version (standard) is the operational version and compares candidates against a group of peers who mostly have operational Financial Control jobs or in whom solid Financial Control knowledge and skills is expected. We measure via several axes and group the top level in two dimensions: conceptual strength (accounting, analytical) and operational strength (hands-on, executing).

The aim of this scan is to objectify your expertise on variety of fiscal questions and situations in the context of a Dutch company with international business connections.

The aim of this scan is to measure the subject matter strength of the candidate in the field of IFRS. Not so much in how the rule is applied, but rather the thinking behind it. Does a candidate wholly understand IFRS or not? This is not a value judgement, merely a useful reflection. Does the candidate perform as a Finance Manager in an IFRS environment and steadily work through the challenges? Is he/she a real sparring partner on this for external advisors? Or does he/she just trust the advisors blindly?

The aim of this scan is to measure individual candidates or complete finance teams on subject-matter strength. This version of the scan (GAAP Neutral) uses a selection of questions from the other widely used scans in various areas of financial control and business control. These are used all over the world to evaluate a candidate’s knowledge/competence in finance areas. The power of the scan (besides the quality of the questions) also lies in the comparison with global participants of different caliber. From the details, we group the strengths into two main groups: traditional financial control strength (accounting, admin) and business partnering strength (FP&A, Digital Finance and Profit Focus).

The aim of this scan is to measure individual candidates or complete finance teams on subject-matter strength. This version of the scan (GAAP Neutral) uses a selection of questions from the other widely used scans in various areas of mostly financial control and some business control. These are used all over the world to evaluate a candidate’s knowledge/competence in finance areas. The power of the scan (besides the quality of the questions) also lies in the comparison with global participants of different caliber. From the details, we group the strengths into two main groups: basic financial control (accounting, admin) and business partnering strength as financial controller (FP&A and Streetwise).

The aim of this scan is to measure individual candidates or complete finance teams on subject-matter strength as Business Controller. This version of the scan uses a selection of questions from our other widely used scans. These are used all over the world to evaluate a candidate’s knowledge/competence in finance areas. The power of the scan (besides the quality of the questions) also lies in the comparison with global participants of different caliber. From the details, we group the strengths into two main groups: traditional financial strength (Basic Finance Needs) and business/digital finance strength (Future Finance Needs).

Your subject matter competencies as RA? How do you relate to associates and CFO's?

The aim of this scan is to objectify the strengths of young potential controllers. They will need different abilities for their future positions depending on the role, and once this power is in picture, we offer them a wonderful moment of reflection. How strong are they in administrative matters, accounting/reporting and F, P&A. Do they have profit value/value creation in them? All these questions will indeed be answered, both in absolute terms and in comparison, with peers. How do brainpower and knowledge compare?